ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the operation of grasping forceps and nursing staff made telescopic injection device were used for the clinical effect of Hemostasises thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods 60 cases of thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients according to the date of surgery were divided into operation group and telescopic grasping forceps injection device group 30 patients were given hemostasia operation grasping forceps extraction hemostatic powder and hemostatic powder into the injection device for telescopic wound hemostasis treatment and preventive treatment, were compared between the two groups in the instrument body, completely hemostatic powder cover the wound time, evacuation time of endoscopic instruments, single hemostatic powder wound coverage, wound bleeding rate, the incidence of bleeding again installed. Results The telescopic injection device group and operation time grasping forceps group into cavity instruments, endoscopic evacuation equipment time showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Hemostatic powder completely cover the wounds of time (24.90 ± 5.90) s and (55.60 ± 25.60) s, there was significant difference between two groups (t=6.401, P<0.01). The single ended wound coverage of blood meal was 86.67%(26/30) and 76.67%(23/30), there was significant difference between two groups (χ2=2.016, P<0.05). Wound bleeding rate was 10.00%(3/30) and 33.33%(10/30), there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=4.812, P<0.05). The incidence of bleeding again to install powder was 10.0%(3/30) and 93.3%(28/30), there was significant difference between two groups (χ2=41.713, P <0.01). Conclusions The nursing staff made telescopic injection device assisted surgery were thoracoscopic lobectomy of the wound to stop bleeding and prevent rebleeding, wound coverage than grasping forceps, completely cover the wound operation less time than grasper, re install a low incidence of hemostatic powder, the whole process to shorten the operation time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the operation of grasping forceps and nursing staff made telescopic injection device were used for the clinical effect of Hemostasises thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods 60 cases of thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients according to the date of surgery were divided into operation group and telescopic grasping forceps injection device group 30 patients were given hemostasia operation grasping forceps extraction hemostatic powder and hemostatic powder into the injection device for telescopic wound hemostasis treatment and preventive treatment, were compared between the two groups in the instrument body, completely hemostatic powder cover the wound time, evacuation time of endoscopic instruments, single hemostatic powder wound coverage, wound bleeding rate, the incidence of bleeding again installed. Results The telescopic injection device group and operation time grasping forceps group into cavity instruments, endoscopic evacuation equipment time showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Hemostatic powder completely cover the wounds of time (24.90 ± 5.90) s and (55.60 ± 25.60) s, there was significant difference between two groups (t=6.401, P<0.01). The single ended wound coverage of blood meal was 86.67%(26/30) and 76.67%(23/30), there was significant difference between two groups (χ2=2.016, P<0.05). Wound bleeding rate was 10.00%(3/30) and 33.33%(10/30), there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=4.812, P<0.05). The incidence of bleeding again to install powder was 10.0%(3/30) and 93.3%(28/30), there was significant difference between two groups (χ2=41.713, P <0.01). Conclusions The nursing staff made telescopic injection device assisted surgery were thoracoscopic lobectomy of the wound to stop bleeding and prevent rebleeding, wound coverage than grasping forceps, completely cover the wound operation less time than grasper, re install a low incidence of hemostatic powder, the whole process to shorten the operation time.